On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote:
> -------- > In message < > cajv_h0yj-fldhr7qv0pgju1kg_xzkr_0cie3agxkxjwd2re...@mail.gmail.com> > , Federico Schwindt writes: > >[..] > >This pollutes cache.h and causes artificial breakages. I'd prefer, if we > >really want to do this, to take the _int.h approach. > > I have refrained from this myself, because I have a really hard time > deciding where the line should be drawn. > We should try to be consistent while we decide. > >I also had a chat with Martin not so long ago and one of the things that > >came in that discussion is the possibility of installing all the includes. > >This is a step backwards from that. > > I'm not too thrilled about that either, because that makes everything > in varnishd an API seen from a VMOD point of view. > Aren't we there already, e.g. https://www.varnish-cache.org/trac/ticket/1759 ? Not installing everything just makes things harder for not much gain AFAICT.
_______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
