-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/16/2015 12:41 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Well OK, but is there really a use case for backends with >> anything shorter than PRIV_VCL lifetime? > > A backend when popens a CGI command for this request ?
I'm sure I wouldn't do that by creating and then destroying a struct director every time. Of course the API can be open for unforeseen ideas, but in this case it seems like a real stretch. And as I said earlier, I have no intuition at all about what a PRIV_CALL-scoped backend could be. Best, Geoff - -- ** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung Scheffelstraße 32 22301 Hamburg Tel +49 40 2880 5731 Mob +49 176 636 90917 Fax +49 40 42949753 http://uplex.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWSdH8AAoJEOUwvh9pJNURGa4P/j/nJkddPcWwsXALJP9Eh+lX 9d2JDatfR0WXKwjWR6X1foeo2pRBXJQKzX66uAYQiWgKy2rXxrLQXeY5fJFehmKx KxH56wx6wRu8Z734MORs1CNLsiy/6gDT3L01IZAr74VVTihtJby7g377dfEOvNLp MRRqzBImIQOYcR4W2ly5cPVSna5y9I2gyn8fPZEFAsizoj0OgjqF3olZuFk2kgbI D7hBtTu7woEPwMAsyZlTzDow8sOT5eOat6IXz8HNR933IJMBio6me53VIVTOCo+/ ydWnx5JWuEJ7loOWEl94B2BW49DzsE2K1YNBEgyma+ePzwWQok59I+FdAbsrEza2 h22+xuguSRFFKvkZU12i0rXtNwqAYMm/HJbZBwUwaT2Afp0DIuJCaVeXhquK9UMV w/g14KjluxHVKjKJIenEtOJ7JAWMsJKYXw1jGdbAliOypiVGcS8umz/ibBHYBEhx iko/GEUnYFB4T+u8GWA8xRgbK3AywmuhniHWDlOU1W76yOIqyo0vaDfZ8iy+avPR v9huUfH7CVS6fBk2auU1UTeld8/YjkR+AmI1fbPF6BwSIFeOS0Z4d70+6RQ0gU7u 5xjVcSYDWFH47zvGkGupnHZUCFot3akNxqFhSMXbchuBQ77iTZiUhRdXGjFZqex9 D21BLdp4J3yzPwXfLZnW =H9Ek -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
