> You guys are seriously missing my point here. > > The point is that we should make it simple and safe for a VMOD > to say: > > Here is a director, please destroy it when... > [ ] This transaction is over > [ ] This VCL becomes cold > [ ] (Any other which might make sense) > [ ] I'l take care of it myself > > And the reasone we should make it easy is *EXACTLY* to not hav > dangling pointers etc.
You are right, I did miss most of this point. I did get the feel of having different scopes with the different kinds of PRIV pointers, but not to this extent. In this case I might have to revisit the docs since I initially wrote them with the VCL's lifespan in mind in the "I'll take care of it myself" case before the 4.1 release. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
