-------- In message <[email protected]>, Nils Goroll writ es: >On 07/09/16 23:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> I'm all for improving stuff in general, and any ideas/patches are >> welcome > >what's your opinion about the suggestion to add obj.uncacheable + return >miss/pass in vcl_hit (see vcl mock in my initial email).
It doesn't "feel" quite right, and it certainly does not seem like something which is so obviously correct that I feel comfortable slamming it in a week before a major release... >The hard part about this is that we currently have an unsolved issue with miss >from hit anyway, [...] Yes, that is the tricky one, and like the other one, I don't think we have anything which is good enough to stuff it in a week before the release. The good news is that there is only 6 months until the next release... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
