>> On 07/09/16 23:20, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>> I'm all for improving stuff in general, and any ideas/patches are >>> welcome >> >> what's your opinion about the suggestion to add obj.uncacheable + return >> miss/pass in vcl_hit (see vcl mock in my initial email). > > It doesn't "feel" quite right
What exactly doesn't? > it certainly does not seem like > something which is so obviously correct that I feel comfortable > slamming it in a week before a major release... This is nothing personal, but the change to hfm with no fallback to the previous logic doesn't seem so obviously correct that I feel comfortable having a major release with it. Nils _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
