-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/12/2017 01:09 PM, Geoff Simmons wrote: > > Again I'm writing in the hope of soliciting opinions, this time > pondering support for UDS in the PROXY protocol.
I should have mentioned that the last mail was entirely about receiving PROXY headers. We can of course send UDS info in PROXY headers to a backend is configured for it, in fact it's the only right thing to do when Varnish is listening at UDS. For PROXYv2 that's straightforward. For PROXYv1 however, it will mean that UNKNOWN will have to be sent when Varnish is listening at UDS. If a backend requires PROXYv1 but always rejects UNKNOWN, and that can't be changed, this might be a bit of a problem. Best, Geoff - -- ** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung Scheffelstraße 32 22301 Hamburg Tel +49 40 2880 5731 Mob +49 176 636 90917 Fax +49 40 42949753 http://uplex.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJZZkB7AAoJEOUwvh9pJNUR5nAP/2/tLDamxwCS4KdCrjPCsz2u IUIJ7eTD/rCep2OPvmwF1WcMftuDMussKOA/S+9MBh73XPqzhtG4xNWluA0e+q+3 zhmHSMlz9qRwmuLJJU9WhWjnKm0PrKzDEf+pnbr71KcenYeLHez7tBojYdz1Yv7Q k1fvh0Rz5Xk8d/ukczDjVr7AIPc8hsk8CoHCk04FUcNokQq+0ScWDcAj9Ygc28R4 GYBnTIf9wHgk/loCZM7H4CCgAyQHPyYtnOC7kRbUySPp/vGq2HukKaqf3R975nCb aQIuKXJ6M0pwOy5DuwuQuMqWeL9hsYpILSPGudI26fWDs85ZXWmilpqO47XFsLDd 49VAlfXsbmFExe1CxZbapWHfNtC5WUdpw2MtCHsx4R1Nep6H7C+pZUzTd9xRqagi Jx3v8lfBNPZrru5ysGi1wWk9w4F6XMBzUnf5w+3ZyUGZ6u0qSRxXtA2dSMA6LL6y P+DYg+B/ZR9614H5Hg+m5/GMWnyTH+NzWw7cbXR2+2ok2/vTExuZezdlq5tGs9GJ kFUt2pC35TIFrw+wlxyNwnKb+K9xpneko8/nK31gO05XrJiTwsFu4M1ImgWGZSt4 F8ozwM6LcVTYEurQEUgqgu0lV86uwdbqqFgAgJlGLIa+wrfsWlVnX6x1JOoE8YlU mmZ9hdw/M0bZAFYIpips =z9fx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ varnish-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-dev
