In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cherife Li writes:
>On 05/27/08 21:42, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cherife Li writes:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'm using v1.1.2.
>>>
>>> Given a .gif file(I'm just testing), IE and curl could hit from cache, 
>>> but firefox never hits.
>> 
>> Use the varnishlog to find out how/why.  Possibly enable the
>> vcl_trace paramter if need be.
>> 
>> My guess:  A cookie ?
>> 
>Ooh, yeah, that's the point.
>Thanks for guiding me out, you saved my life.
>I should be more careful as I did see the "pass" in the varnishlog.
>
>And one more question, with
>   remove req.http.cookie; (or Cookie)
>   remove req.http.Accept-Encoding; (or with low case a and e),
>the varnishlog still shows Cookie and Accept-Encoding headers.
>Does this mean the original headers varnish received?
>If not, varnish didn't remove these headers, did it?

RxHeaders is exactly what was received from the client or backend.
TxHeaders are exactly what we send to the backend/client.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Reply via email to