On 05/27/08 23:21, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cherife Li writes:
>> On 05/27/08 21:42, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cherife Li writes:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm using v1.1.2.
>>>>
>>>> Given a .gif file(I'm just testing), IE and curl could hit from cache, 
>>>> but firefox never hits.
>>> Use the varnishlog to find out how/why.  Possibly enable the
>>> vcl_trace paramter if need be.
>>>
>>> My guess:  A cookie ?
>>>
>> Ooh, yeah, that's the point.
>> Thanks for guiding me out, you saved my life.
>> I should be more careful as I did see the "pass" in the varnishlog.
>>
>> And one more question, with
>>   remove req.http.cookie; (or Cookie)
>>   remove req.http.Accept-Encoding; (or with low case a and e),
>> the varnishlog still shows Cookie and Accept-Encoding headers.
>> Does this mean the original headers varnish received?
>> If not, varnish didn't remove these headers, did it?
> 
> RxHeaders is exactly what was received from the client or backend.
> TxHeaders are exactly what we send to the backend/client.
> 
Got it. I tested and saw the difference.
Thanks again for your time.
-- 
Rgds,
Cherife.
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Reply via email to