In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nick Loman writes: >I started on Varnish 2.0-rc1, which was 99% great, but we experienced a >problem which was unfortunately a show-stopper. See my post on the 9th >October, "Mac connection problem with Varnish 2.0-rc1". If it wasn't for >that, I'd be using Varnish 2.0 on our production sites right now.
I looked at that and didn't see anything in the varnishlog output that indicated a problem. I have no idea what the safari error you quoted in the message mean... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
