In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nick Loman writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nick Loman writes: >> >>> I started on Varnish 2.0-rc1, which was 99% great, but we experienced a >>> problem which was unfortunately a show-stopper. See my post on the 9th >>> October, "Mac connection problem with Varnish 2.0-rc1". If it wasn't for >>> that, I'd be using Varnish 2.0 on our production sites right now. >> >> I looked at that and didn't see anything in the varnishlog output >> that indicated a problem. > >Nor did I! ;)
Are you sure that transaction was from one of the failing views ? >Where should I go from here? I could try the latest trunk, I guess? Make sure you get a failing transaction in the varnishlog. If that shows nothing abnormal, try getting a tcpdump of that transaction and see if there is anything abnormal in that. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
