In message <[email protected]>, Anton Stonor writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> As far as I can tell, a zero TTL (number after "RFC") can only >> happen here if your default_ttl parameter is set to zero, OR >> if there is clock-skew between the varnish machine and the >> backend machine. > >Right on! > >Backend is running on the same box as Varnish for this test. But: you >are right about default TTL being 0.
I hope we don't ship varnish that way on any platforms, the default ttl should be 120 seconds... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
