On Jan 29, 2009, at 2:47 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <49818470.10...@giraffen.dk>, Anton Stonor writes: >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >>> I hope we don't ship varnish that way on any platforms, the default >>> ttl should be 120 seconds... >> >> No, the "0" default ttl comes from this one: >> >> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/plone.recipe.varnish >> >> From the changelog: "Add a default_ttl of zero seconds to the Varnish >> runner to avoid a Varnish bug with the handling of an Expires header >> with a date in the past." > > That's been fixed, but I can't remember if it made it back to 2.0.x
Ahh, cool. Fixed starting with which version? Ric _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list varnish-misc@projects.linpro.no http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
