In message <[email protected]>, Barry Abraham son writes:
>> This week we upgraded to 2.0.2 and are using varnish's back end & >> director configuration for the same work. What we are seeing is that >> 2.0.2 holds about 60% of the objects in the same amount of cache space >> as 1.1.2 did (we tried tcmalloc, jemalloc, and mmap.) Your description does not make it obvious to me what is causing this but one candidate could be the stored hash-string, in particular if your URLS are long. The new purge code (likely included in 2.0.3, but already available in -trunk) dispenses with the need to store the hash-string so theory could be tested. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
