On Feb 4, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[email protected]>, > Barry Abraham > son writes: > >>> This week we upgraded to 2.0.2 and are using varnish's back end & >>> director configuration for the same work. What we are seeing is >>> that >>> 2.0.2 holds about 60% of the objects in the same amount of cache >>> space >>> as 1.1.2 did (we tried tcmalloc, jemalloc, and mmap.) > > Your description does not make it obvious to me what is causing this > but one candidate could be the stored hash-string, in particular if > your URLS are long. > > The new purge code (likely included in 2.0.3, but already available > in -trunk) dispenses with the need to store the hash-string so theory > could be tested.
Upgraded to trunk, didn't help. -- Barry Abrahamson | Systems Wrangler | Automattic Blog: http://barry.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
