In message <15261481.301265709947078.javamail....@syntop>, [email protected] writes:
>I'm not sure we're still talking about the same problem. :-) >Just to be sure: we don't want to cache that dynamic page, but I'm >wondering why (with those) headers, it's still seen as obj.cacheable >by Varnish. As I said, the cacheability is a different decision from how long time to cache. The logic of the code is in the sourcefile "rfc2616.c", try to walk your request through it by hand... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://projects.linpro.no/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
