Thanks. Out of curiosity, the file stevedore is documented with: "file: mmap's a file and uses it for storage" - why can't this be made persistent? And what's the difference from -s persistent?
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Traian Bratucu <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no persistent cache in varnish. At least, not yet. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yang Zhang > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 2:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Understanding persistent storage > > Hi, we're reconsidering using Varnish again, and this question I posted 4 > months ago is the biggest blocker for us. We've been using Squid for a > while, but it doesn't have collapsed forwarding, which we need (and Varnish > provides). But we also need a persistent cache. > We're ready to roll our own caching proxy, but if Varnish already provides > persistence, then that would be a huge boon. We tried playing around with > Varnish -s persistent 4 months ago but it didn't seem to be what the name > implied. > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > -- Yang Zhang http://yz.mit.edu/ _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
