On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]> wrote: > In message > <e7097bfb283e614c96ae10d5307726e301c0ff99e...@slothmail.eea.eu.int>, > Traian Bratucu writes: > >>There is no persistent cache in varnish. At least, not yet. > > Uhm, you are not up to date. > > Varnish does have an -spersistent storage function, and it should work > better in 3.0 than it did in 2.x, but it is far from perfect yet. > > I don't know what the original poster found wanting last time, I can > only suggest that he gives -trunk a spin and see if he likes it better > now.
What I found last time was: (1) Fetch a page. Miss first time, hit subsequent times. (2) Restart Varnish. (3) Fetch same page. Miss. Also, docs mention things like "When storage is full, Varnish should restart, cleaning storage." > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > -- Yang Zhang http://yz.mit.edu/ _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] http://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
