On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Kacper Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Per Buer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Kacper Wysocki <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I also noticed similar behavior with large files with Varnish 3.0.1.
> >> Today, when I tried to do large files.. Here's a wget run.
> >>
> >> 2011-10-07 17:18:59 (442 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 28062437.
> Retrying.
> >> 2011-10-07 17:20:03 (486 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 59268331.
> Retrying.
> >> 2011-10-07 17:21:07 (500 KB/s) - Connection closed at byte 90762224.
> Retrying.
> >
> >
> > Notice that there is 60 seconds between each fetch + some time to
> reconnect. 60s is the default for send_timeout since 3.0. It used to be 600
> seconds.
>
> There were bytes in transit thoughout the session.
>

Yes. We don't care. :-)

No, but seriously, this is still hitting the timeout. PHK changed the
default back in February after some discussions in the user group. I think
Tollef is working on making the timeout actually not hit unless you have no
data going over the connection. Hopefully we'll expect a patch within the
week.

-- 
Per Buer, CEO
Phone: +47 21 98 92 61 / Mobile: +47 958 39 117 / Skype: per.buer
*Varnish makes websites fly!*
Whitepapers <http://www.varnish-software.com/whitepapers> |
Video<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7t2Sp174eI> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/varnishsoftware>
_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Reply via email to