]] Kacper Wysocki | On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Tollef Fog Heen | <[email protected]> wrote: | > ]] Kacper Wysocki | > | > | setting send_timeout lower does make this problem more frequent for me | > | and setting this higher makes it less frequent, but why exactly are we | > | hitting the send timeout here? doesnt make sense to me. | | > Because our implementations of TCP timeouts is not completely correct or | > complete. You could try https://gist.github.com/1275251 and see if that | > makes for more happiness. | | Oh, who knew. So if you set the timeout to 10s then it will kill | transfers at 10 seconds?
Yes. This is actually documented, if a bit surprising. | I could try patching the version string to 3.0.2 or do you mean there | is some change in 3.0.2 that attempts to make more happiness? Oh, that was the wrong patch, try https://gist.github.com/1277365 instead. -- Tollef Fog Heen Varnish Software t: +47 21 98 92 64 _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
