Guillaume, The documentation isn’t the most update but the code invalidates (reaches) the cache.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/23774285/113247 <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/b6613e86bd25e6dca1bf0e44d70b310d355207a0?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fa%2F23774285%2F113247&userId=74734&signature=12371bb8a9614048> this can shed light. Please guide me if this isn’t exactly the behavior to set req.hash_always_miss = req.http.secretheader == "true"; > Not as such, it will fetch a new copy regardless and once cached it > will shadow the previous one (that will eventually go away). > > Dridi, How can two copies of the same cache key exist (assuming the URL is the key here)? Won’t that create conflicts? > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc > <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/08d6a4ec73e8d8d57e35f0e764c576e39774dfe0?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.varnish-cache.org%2Flists%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fvarnish-misc&userId=74734&signature=30faa7489d5ddc18> >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
