Ok, then Dridi's answer is correct. Not a problem to have more than one object under the same hash, it's notably possible using Vary header (different variant of the same object)
-- Guillaume Quintard On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Quintin Par <[email protected]> wrote: > Guillaume, > > The documentation isn’t the most update but the code invalidates (reaches) > the cache. > > https://stackoverflow.com/a/23774285/113247 > <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/b6613e86bd25e6dca1bf0e44d70b310d355207a0?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstackoverflow.com%2Fa%2F23774285%2F113247&userId=74734&signature=12371bb8a9614048> > this can shed light. Please guide me if this isn’t exactly the behavior to > > set req.hash_always_miss = req.http.secretheader == "true"; > > > >> Not as such, it will fetch a new copy regardless and once cached it >> will shadow the previous one (that will eventually go away). >> >> Dridi, > > How can two copies of the same cache key exist (assuming the URL is the > key here)? Won’t that create conflicts? > > >> _______________________________________________ >> varnish-misc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >> <https://mailtrack.io/trace/link/08d6a4ec73e8d8d57e35f0e764c576e39774dfe0?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.varnish-cache.org%2Flists%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fvarnish-misc&userId=74734&signature=30faa7489d5ddc18> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
