Hi, Could it simply be your backend complaining? Notably, I'm pretty sure that WWW-Authenticate header doesn't come from Varnish, but I may be wrong.
Cheers, -- Guillaume Quintard On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Sergio Rus <[email protected]> wrote: > Varnish 3 is quite old, I know. But it's still supported by Ubuntu 14 LTS. > That's why I'm still using it. I will move to a recent version soon. > > In regards to the issue, I don't have any return(error) in the VCL I > wrote. So maybe it's coming from somewhere in the default VCL? > > I read about those parameters you mentioned already, and even increased > them just for testing, but didn't work at that time, testing bigger files. > So in any case that would be a partial solution, because it would fail at > some point with larger payloads. I'm currently using the default values for > those parameters, 8K, which is very close to the threshold I manually found > in the logs I posted. If you see the payload size, it's nearly 8K. Only > adding or removing a few bytes in the payload changes the behaviour in > Varnish. But the headers size in any case is the same, so that's why I > don't understand what's happening. The payload size seems to be affecting > here. > > Cheers > > _______________________________________________ > varnish-misc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
