On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Sergio Rus <[email protected]> wrote: > Varnish 3 is quite old, I know. But it's still supported by Ubuntu 14 LTS. > That's why I'm still using it. I will move to a recent version soon.
I don't think Ubuntu supports Varnish in any way. In my book that would mean you could open a ticket to them and have the package maintainer track down the bug and provide a fix (especially since _we_ won't do that considering it's EOL). > In regards to the issue, I don't have any return(error) in the VCL I wrote. > So maybe it's coming from somewhere in the default VCL? I don't think so, looking closer I don't see any hint at that (and don't remember any return(error) in the built-in off the top of my head). > I read about those parameters you mentioned already, and even increased them > just for testing, but didn't work at that time, testing bigger files. So in > any case that would be a partial solution, because it would fail at some > point with larger payloads. I'm currently using the default values for those > parameters, 8K, which is very close to the threshold I manually found in the > logs I posted. If you see the payload size, it's nearly 8K. Only adding or > removing a few bytes in the payload changes the behaviour in Varnish. But > the headers size in any case is the same, so that's why I don't understand > what's happening. The payload size seems to be affecting here. Very puzzling but sorry, I dipped my toes and don't feel like diving :( Dridi _______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
