On 8/6/21 02:59, Guillaume Quintard wrote: > > In short, all images are now supported on amd64, arm32v7, arm64v8, i386, > ppc64le, and s390x. And on top of this, the "fresh" tags are also > accessible with an "-alpine" suffix (fresh-alpine, 6.6.1-alpine, etc.).
Guillaume this is good news, thanks for this effort. Can you (or anyone) share some info about how well Varnish performs with musl libc? I like the goals of the musl project, and I sure would like to get Varnish to run on smaller images, but I've been reluctant to seriously try it on alpine. Because I'm not sure how well optimized musl is compared to the old standby glibc, and Varnish needs to perform well. glibc's reputation is that it's been around for a long time, and has had a lot of opportunities for performance improvement. On the other hand, glibc bugs me sometimes by taking liberties with non-standard features. musl aims for stronger standards compliance, but is much newer, which has made me wonder if it could support the performance we like to get from Varnish. But it's been a few years now, so maybe I shouldn't worry about it. Also, I recall that for a while the alpine build was unable to pass make check. Is that working now? Thanks again, Geoff -- ** * * UPLEX - Nils Goroll Systemoptimierung Scheffelstraße 32 22301 Hamburg Tel +49 40 2880 5731 Mob +49 176 636 90917 Fax +49 40 42949753 http://uplex.de
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
