Replying to all this time On Fri, Aug 13, 2021, 08:48 Guillaume Quintard <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 3:31 AM Geoff Simmons <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can you (or anyone) share some info about how well Varnish performs with >> musl libc? >> > > Good question, and unfortunately, I don't have a good answer in return as > I haven't benchmarked it, so feedback is more than welcome. > > What I can comment on is that musl is quite adamant about being standard > and pure, so it will hopefully be more portable and will let compilers do > more work. As you mentioned, we've had issues in the past compiling and > testing with it, but it should be all behind us now: > - there were some header issues that prevented us from compiling, but we > fixed that a couple of years ago > - libbacktrace isn't available on Alpine, which prompted the move to > libunwind (can we make it the default now?) > - it has help fix a few compiler warning issues lately > > Cheers, > > -- > Guillaume Quintard > >
_______________________________________________ varnish-misc mailing list [email protected] https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc
