Hi Carlos,

Correct, but that’s my problem. There are only two IPs in XFF: the original 
sender (and thus the one that can be spoofed) and the ALB’s IP, which is 
basically useless.  I realize I can’t trust the first IP, but the client IP 
being the ALB doesn’t help because I need to restrict by the actual source IP, 
which apparently (unless AWS support tells me differently) I can’t actually 
know for sure once the request is behind the ALB. If that is the case, then 
I’ll definitely have to go back to the two ALB solution since then the special 
Varnish ACL can be handled once again by the ALB’s SG. I don’t like having two 
ALBs to manage, but it seems it’s probably the only way to handle this 
situation.

Justin

From: Carlos Abalde <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 1:35 PM
To: Justin Lloyd <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Varnish and AWS ALBs

Hi Justin,

You cannot rely on the first IP in XFF (I guess you're doing that at the 
moment), but you can rely on the next-to-last. The last one is added to XFF by 
Varnish before entering 'vcl_recv', and the next-to-last is added by the ALB. 
That's the client IP as seen by the ALB and cannot be forged by clients.

Best,

--
Carlos Abalde


On 19 Aug 2021, at 22:11, Justin Lloyd 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi all,

Is anyone else running Varnish behind AWS ALBs? I just encountered an issue 
today with how I have been using X-Forwarded-For to check against a Varnish ACL 
in that is more restrictive than the ALB’s security group, but I realized the 
hard way that since X-Forwarded-For can be arbitrarily set, a malicious actor 
can set it to an address that is permitted by the Varnish ACL, whether through 
guessing or other knowledge. Since Varnish gets XFF from the ALB, which in turn 
trusts existing XFF headers, you can’t then really trust client.ip since it’s 
just taken from XFF. Unless I’m missing something...

I’ve opened a support case with AWS to see if there’s a way to configure an ALB 
to not trust XFF and use the IP from the original TCP connection, but I’m not 
hopeful. I’ll likely have to go back to using two ALBs rather than one 
relatively open one and one with a Varnish ACL for tigher controls to a certain 
subset of the web sites behind the single ALB.

Justin

_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

_______________________________________________
varnish-misc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.varnish-cache.org/lists/mailman/listinfo/varnish-misc

Reply via email to