Klaus, What's the likelihood of something like this making it into a 4.2 update, or maybe an early 4.3 update? There seems to be a lot of interest in the forums and on the mailing list for a way to add custom HGCM servers and clients, and the extension pack interface seems like a good way to support this use case.
Jeff Westfahl Klaus Espenlaub <[email protected]> wrote on 08/06/2013 12:10:14 PM: > From: Klaus Espenlaub <[email protected]> > To: [email protected], > Date: 08/06/2013 12:11 PM > Subject: Re: [vbox-dev] [PATCH RFC] Allow an extension pack to load an HGCM service > > Hi Jeff, > > thanks for this mail, was a bit faster than I could ask for such a > statement :) > > On 06.08.2013 18:03, Jeff Westfahl wrote: > > Author: Jeff Westfahl <[email protected]> > > License: Patch is under MIT License > > I'm still reviewing the change, which overall looks very sensible. We > want the product to be extensible, and this certainly wasn't easily > possible before in this particular area. > > Klaus > > _______________________________________________ > vbox-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev _______________________________________________ vbox-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.virtualbox.org/mailman/listinfo/vbox-dev
