On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 08:02:06AM -0400, Pablo Sanchez wrote: > [ Comments below, in-line ] > > On 05/16/2012 07:00 AM, Chris Green wrote: > > > > Yes, OK, but if I had to do that with every application > > Hi Chris, > > When you cite `application' above, are you talking about VM's or > generic applications. I think we can agree that VM's are somewhat > complicated beasts. > So are lots of other applications - gimp, firefox. Yes I realise that a VM is a bit of a different beast but it does seem that the simple case where you have the standard ~/.VirtualBox directory with all of its files in standard places it should be possible for a new version of VirtualBox to 'see' this and pick things up.
It's OK, I'm happy enough as it wasn't too hard to get VirtualBox working again. It's just a thought for the developers. -- Chris Green ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ VBox-users-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community
