hi lee,
yes sometimes it's as easy as plugging in the cable ....
shame on me and thx for the straight tip.

cheers
guenter

Am Donnerstag, 15. Februar 2007 14:38 schrieb Lee MaRS:
> hi chymian,
>
> I'm not sure what problem you met. Last time I met a similar problem.
> At last I found that I forget to turn the interface up, etc. ifconfig
> eth0 up and ifconfig tap1 up.
>
> Yes, it's so naive. But I hope that it works..
>
> Regards,
> Lee.MaRS
>
> On 2/15/07, chymian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi gang,
> > new to virtualBox (1.3.4) i try to setup either dynamic or static tap
> > devices for a bridged traffic to my debian etch host (kaladur).
> >
> > starting with static tap, everything looks fine from the sysadmin side:
> >
> > Feb 15 12:47:57 kaladur kernel: device tap1 entered promiscuous mode
> > Feb 15 12:47:57 kaladur kernel: br0: port 2(tap1) entering learning state
> > Feb 15 12:48:06 kaladur kernel: br0: topology change detected,
> > propagating Feb 15 12:48:06 kaladur kernel: br0: port 2(tap1) entering
> > forwarding state
> >
> > $ brctl show
> > bridge name     bridge id                               STP enabled    
> > interfaces br0                     8000.00112fb89442       no            
> >          eth0 tap1
> >
> > so tap1 & eth0 belong to the bridge, eth0 works fine for my ws.
> > for the debian sarge guest (or other linuxes):
> > 1.) it seems that no arp reply gets through, ergo no communication can
> > happen. 2.) using DHCP instead of static IP in the guest, doesn't work
> > either: Feb 15 12:54:54 cosinus  udhcpd[171]: received DISCOVER from
> > 08:00:27:81:03:88 Feb 15 12:54:55 cosinus  udhcpd[171]: No valid arp
> > replies for this address (192.168.1.200)
> > Feb 15 12:54:55 cosinus  udhcpd[171]: broadcasting OFFER of 192.168.1.200
> > to 08:00:27:81:03:88
> >
> > when i wireshark (trace) the br0, i see arp requests & answers as well as
> > the DHCP discover & offers.
> > seems that neither the direct adressed arp packages nor the
> > BC-dhcp-offers get through. NAT is working, but unfortunately no option
> > for running a server as guest.
> >
> >
> > any hints?
> >
> > cheers & TIA
> > guenter
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > vbox-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> vbox-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users

_______________________________________________
vbox-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users

Reply via email to