On Wednesday 28 March 2007, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:34 +0200, David Baron wrote: > > Here is something else I found picked up by logcheck: > > Mar 28 12:06:20 d_baron spamd[6478]: dns: sendto() failed: Operation not > > permitted at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line 340, > > <GEN56> line 652. > > Mar 28 12:06:21 d_baron spamd[6477]: dns: sendto() failed: Operation not > > permitted at /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line 340, > > <GEN87> line 74. > > > > But why would spamd be sitting on DNS from an http lookup. (Or maybe this > > has nothing to do with it!?) > > > :-) > > Your iptables rules are too tight. You need to allow outbound domain > queries (UDP & TCP), as well as inbound replies, in order for SA to > work.
True but I have no restrictions that I know of. I never had such messages from SA before and did not get them again. _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
