Hello Pablo, Pablo Sanchez wrote:
> I don't believe your initial sarcastic tone helped and now we're here: > you saying David's e-mail will go to /dev/null. In that "sarcastic" letter I asked him to provide some details on his otherwise useless criticism. I'm very sorry for him if he couldn't understand it, but I wanted to make it clear that this kind of criticism is not welcome (in addition, it was not the first time when I heard things like that from him). > In the above case, the snapshotting > interface is 'rough' It needs to be improved. Early on, I found it > 'klunky' as well however it's more to do with the naming rather than > the engineering. I believe a first cut would be to change the UI to > make it 'smoother' - anyway, I'm digressing. Yes, I agree with you (as I already agreed in my initial discussion with nospam312) about the complexity and roughness of the current UI but as I said we're working on finding better naming for it, among other things. If you have well-thought ideas or reasoned critics you want to share -- please feel free to do it. > To /dev/null David is very severe and alienates the user > base. Don't worry, it relates only to my Thunderbird client (and neither to innotek, nor to virtualbox.org forums/mail-lists of course). Anyway, my apologies to everyone who took it personally (if any). Though, I think that a good dose of sarcasm is not that bad, since it lets you get rid of emotions in quite a polite form :) -- keep cool, Dmitry A. Kuminov _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
