Hi! What you want is to have a place where 2 guest can read and write at the same time, right? Why don't you use shared folders for that? Give access to both guest to the same folder on the host.
Cumps On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Brian J. Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 11:07 -0400, Pablo Sanchez wrote: > > > > The problem with VirtualBox is you can't have two VM's mount the same > > VDI. > > How does it prevent it? Is it as I described in my last message in the > GUI? Does using a raw disk really prevent the GUI from preventing one > from assigning the disk to two VMs? This is not so bad if it's the case > since I would use real disks anyway -- which is what I do with VMware > Server currently. I've never tried to share virtual disks. > > > You could do it with a raw device and you'd have to each VM > > install a Clustered File System - theoretically it should work. > > But if the GUI prevents the dual assignment as above, it won't be > possible. > > > Apparently VMware Server makes it very simple to implement the `shared > > disk' > > "simple"? Maybe. It requires some .vmdk file tweaks. But that's for > another list. :-) > > b. > > > _______________________________________________ > vbox-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users > > -- -- "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible." Sir Arthur C. Clarke
_______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list [email protected] http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
