On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Rance Hall <ran...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Alexey Eremenko <al4...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Geoff Galitz <ge...@galitz.org> wrote: >>> >>>> > Seriously - doing this would defeat the whole purpose of >>>> > virtualization. >>> >>> Not necessarily. Sometimes the purpose of virtualization is integration >>> rather than segregation. My primary workstation is Vista Business with an >>> Ubuntu 9.04 VM running in windowless mode with a shared folder for my source >>> code and documents. >>> >>> This allows me to use to my favored tools in both environments with little >>> overhead. Speaking directly to the original question, I use TortoiseSVN on >>> the Vista side to manage my code and test client connectivity and then I use >>> the Ubuntu side to compile it and build the documentation via hyperlatex. >>> This is all done with a single shared folder that points to my source code. >>> >>> Adding SSH or some other remote access tool and you can indeed run commands >>> on the host. >>> >> >> I think the other way around should have less potential security risks. >> The is manage guests from host. >> >> See: >> http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/893 >> >> What do you think ? >> -- >> -"Technologov" >> > > I'm interested in this discussion so I'm piping in... > > It seems to me that the solution in 893 is only partially interesting. > > I can definitely see the scripting advantages to the 893 solution and > I definitely think its worth the time to implement. >
if you like solution 893, then please vote for it inside the bug. Just Add comments, like: "+1 vote". -- -"Technologov" _______________________________________________ vbox-users mailing list vbox-users@virtualbox.org http://vbox.innotek.de/mailman/listinfo/vbox-users
