Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jeff Hedlund wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wasn't seeing this under 5.3.21...
What's the problem that has returned?
That line should look like:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Makes sense to me.
Isn't that the correct delivery to line (at least for the way vpopmail has handled it, [EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Unless the line is supposed to be telling me something other than who it was delivered to, no. :)
I'm running 5.3.20 with my patches that were in 5.3.21, and I'm getting the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I now see that it should be removing that front domain part. But it isn't for me, for some reason...
Perhaps I missed a thread on the previous problem...
I vaguely recall someone bringing this up not too long ago. I think they were using that header in some odd config where an exchange server was pulling all the mail out of a catchall box. When the header changed, it broke their setup. I think they were beaten down for using exchange or somesuch thing, but I don't recall what the final decision was. I only know it worked under 5.3.21...
I now see what you are talking about. I was under the misconception that vpopmail used [EMAIL PROTECTED] on purpose. I rarely inspect my Delivered-To headers and I've never used them for any application (besides looping, of course).
BTW - here's the thread you were talking about: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=vchkpw&m=105660202810731&w=2
Anyway, I wonder why I'm getting the problem in my version... if I figure it out, I'll check out 5.3.24 and see what's up there too.
Jeff --
/\ /\ .. .. .. [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \/ \ a t r i x . . . . . . . (770) 794-7233 s o f t w a r e i n c .. .. .. http://www.matrixsi.com
