Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 10:05, Sigmund Gudvangen a écrit :
> Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 02:50, Tom Collins a écrit :
> > On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 05:27  PM, David Bristol wrote:

> >
> > For debugging purposes, it's best to have the server use it's real
> > name.  You can adjust that by editing control/bouncehost and setting it
> > to a single name.
> Yes, setting a bouncehost works. The snag is that the only sensible thing
> then must be to set bounchost to something neutral, like Mailserver. It
> cannot be set to domA or domB, as bounce messages from the other domain
> will then be utterly missleading.
> For the sake of argument, suppose that somebody wants to send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but miss-spells the name and writes e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He
> will receive a bounce message, but he will have no idea which message
> bounced, as there will no indication from where it come. So, his
> interlocateur Kvaksvik will be wondering why he hasn't received the message
> he is waiting for and thake his buisness elsewhere.
> Have I missunderstood something or is this really the state of affairs in
> 2003?

Yes, I think I did missunerstand it. The above scenario isn't true of cause, 
as the bounce message will say

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at Mailserver.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. 
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. 

Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1) 

And then it isn't such a bad idea having the host name in the bounce message. 
Sorry, just a popmail newbie that hadn't had his coffe yet.

> Regards
> Sigmund.

Reply via email to