ok thanks. This makes sense.
Some of us were (I know I was) under the impression
we needed to tag a jira issue with every commit - no matter how big or
small the changes. This makes it easier for the small typo changes.
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Kevan Miller wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 11:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > That strikes me as a bit of an overkill. For example, if you see a
> > variable that can be named a little better or if there's a spelling
> > error then I don't see the need to file a Jira at all.
> > In my opinion Jira is, in addition to a tracking mechanism for
> > what's going into which release, a communication mechanism for
> > developers to announce what they feel needs to be done and who
> > intends to work on it; it's kinda a macroscopic thing. It is also a
> > mechanism for the community to officially make its wishes known as
> > well as the usual bug reporting thing.
> > Mentors? Thoughts?
> Totally agree.