Regarding NFS, below are a few practical reasons to not use local hard
disks to host the images as they run.
1) Say each image is 10GB, on a 72GB hard drive (the standard "large"
drive in a blade), that means as a maximum consolidation you can only
have 7 VM's on a blade. A blade can likely handle between 4 - 30 VMs
depending on how powerful it is, so this would be a gross
2) It takes a VERY long time to copy images to and from the blades
(3-6 MB/s) because of the difficult file system translation between to
and from the VMFS filesystem format on the hypervisor.
3) ESX 3i (the free, efficient hypervisor) is designed to boot as a
disksless hypervisor, so ESX3i environments would be out which would
reduce the number of folks who could do this dramaticlly
4) Although it seems performance counter-intuative, actually if
booting from an actual storage system with multiple disks, VMs will
perform quicker when booting over the network. Consider the HD
thrashing that would occur if a single disk were really handling the I/
O operations of 20VMs on a single hypervisor. Believe it or not, the
network is faster.
5) While not possible with VCL today, if the instance images live on
the network natively, the opportunity to do things like Vmotion aren't
totally out of the question, but those are not at all possible with
local disk boot.
In regards to image re-using, your configuration is not correct. It
sounds like you need to create a few more computer "slot" entries in
the computer table and link those slots to your hypervisor entry in
the computer table. The number of "slots" you have equals the number
of virtual machines that can run concurrently. Notice it actually
copies it from /golden/<image_name>/ to /inuse/<slot_name>. Once a
slot is created, remember to associate it with a hypervisor through
the "Virtual Hosts" area. If you still can't get this, post up some
of the lines in your computer table's DB.
Secure Open Systems Initiative
On May 6, 2009, at 2:07 AM, 乔木 wrote:
We have setup the environment for VM provision on ESXi recently. We
confused about some mechanisms:
- Images are stored in NFS
As I see, VCL stores images in NFS and just copy it locally when
It means that the hardisk in the esxi hypervisor will not be used.
VMs are stored in remote computer and all the operations will be
operation (CPU exsits in Hypervisor but hardisk exsits in NFS). I
may lead performance problems. Although we can setup mutiple NFS
is not good that the hardisk in the hypervisor is not used and all the
operations will be remote in my opinion. Why not transfer the image
esxi hypervisor which will run the image?
- Image reusing
When we use an image from repository, VCL does: 1. copy the image form
/golden/<image_name> to /inuse/<image_name>, 2. start the image. It's
difficult for image reusing. It's impossible for mutiple machines to
same image because the copy operation will only copy one image to
folder and that image can be used only for one esxi hypervisor.
operation will overwrite that image. Again, if we transfer the image
hypervisor, there won't be such problem.
MOE KLINNS Lab and SKLMS Lab, Xi'an Jiaotong University
Department of Computer Science and Technology, Xi’an Jiaotong