Makes sense to me.
Mike Waldron Systems Specialist ITS Research Computing University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CB 3420, ITS Manning, Rm 2509 919-962-9778 -----Original Message----- From: Josh Thompson [mailto:josh_thomp...@ncsu.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 9:52 AM To: vcl-dev@incubator.apache.org; vcl-u...@incubator.apache.org Subject: use of these lists -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 When we started at ASF, the vcl-user list wasn't really used much. So, most user questions were sent to the vcl-dev list. The community has grown quite a bit since then, and the vcl-user list is starting to see more use. I think it would be a good idea to somewhat "officially" distinguish the two lists moving forward. Any discussion about things related to the development of VCL should go to the vcl-dev list. Any discussion about installation, configuration, and use of VCL should go to the vcl-user list. If you're not sure which list something should go to, just pick one. No one's going to be mean to you about sending it to the wrong list, though if it would be more appropriate to the other list, someone may choose to include the other list in replies. Does this sound like a good idea? Thanks, Josh - -- - ------------------------------- Josh Thompson VCL Developer North Carolina State University my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk1SqgwACgkQV/LQcNdtPQNQiQCdGBdZf2dThXIiPyxJZLG9fjmq D4wAn0+vV2fWMgULyWf3h+0Cf4sq4UpM =N8RF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
