Good evening, I apologize for the numerous emails, but as I continue working through this something new popped up:
I managed to get LWP::Protocol::https to install by first updating Net::SSLLeay with CPAN. However, when making a block allocation I now get this in the log: |4978|blockrequest| ---- CRITICAL ---- |4978|blockrequest| 2012-01-24 20:53:45|4978|blockrequest|vcld:die_handler(636)|Can't locate object method "type" via package "RPC::XML::Client::send_request: HTTP server error:*Can't connect to urichmond.longsight.com:443 (certificate verify failed)*" (perhaps you forgot to load "RPC::XML::Client::send_request: HTTP server error: Can't connect to server.domain.com:443 (certificate verify failed)"?) at /usr/local/vcl/bin/../lib/VCL/utils.pm line 9121. |4978|blockrequest| ( 0) vcld, die_handler (line: 636) |4978|blockrequest| (-1) utils.pm, xmlrpc_call (line: 9121) |4978|blockrequest| (-2) blockrequest.pm, process_block_time (line: 373) |4978|blockrequest| (-3) blockrequest.pm, process (line: 193) |4978|blockrequest| (-4) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568) |4978|blockrequest| (-5) vcld, main (line: 448) 2012-01-24 20:53:45|4978|blockrequest|State.pm:DESTROY(829)|VCL::blockrequest destructor called, address: f7be070 2012-01-24 20:53:45|4978|blockrequest|State.pm:DESTROY(848)|number of database handles state process created: 1 2012-01-24 20:53:45|4138|vcld:REAPER(718)|VCL process exited for reservation <unknown>, PID: 4978, signal: CHLD My limited understanding of PERL is at play here, but from my research it seems that updated versions of LWP::UserAgent do strict SSL certificate checking. (We do have a CA-issued SSL cert installed for the VCL Web front end.) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/74358/how-can-i-get-lwp-to-validate-ssl-server-certificates I'd very much appreciate any feedback from experts on the list. Many thanks, Mike On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 20:12, Mike Haudenschild <m...@longsight.com> wrote: > I've been looking into this further, and I've found what appears to be a > missing PERL module (LWP::Protocol::https). I attempted to install it > manually with CPAN, but I get two test errors. I've attached the CPAN > error message immediately below, and the section of vcld.log from the > moment I save the block allocation. > > Thanks to all, > Mike > > ------ > > t/apache....# Failed test 1 in t/apache.t at line 12 > # t/apache.t line 12 is: ok($res->is_success); > # Failed test 2 in t/apache.t at line 13 > # t/apache.t line 13 is: ok($res->content =~ /Apache Software > Foundation/); > t/apache....FAILED tests 1-2 > Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > t/apache.t 2 2 100.00% 1-2 > Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 2/2 subtests failed, 0.00% okay. > make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255 > /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK > Running make install > make test had returned bad status, won't install without force > > ------ > > > 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|blockrequest.pm:process(166)|owner > email: root@localhost > Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > /usr/local/vcl/bin/../lib/VCL/blockrequest.pm line 167 (#1) > (W uninitialized) An undefined value was used as if it were already > defined. It was interpreted as a "" or a 0, but maybe it was a > mistake. > To suppress this warning assign a defined value to your variables. > > To help you figure out what was undefined, perl tells you what > operation > you used the undefined value in. Note, however, that perl optimizes > your > program and the operation displayed in the warning may not necessarily > appear literally in your program. For example, "that $foo" is > usually optimized into "that " . $foo, and the warning will refer to > the concatenation (.) operator, even though there is no . in your > program. > > > |3518|blockrequest| ---- WARNING ---- > |3518|blockrequest| 2012-01-24 > 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|vcld:warning_handler(610)|Use > of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at > /usr/local/vcl/bin/../lib/VCL/blockrequest.pm line 167. > |3518|blockrequest| ( 0) vcld, warning_handler (line: 610) > |3518|blockrequest| (-1) blockrequest.pm, process (line: 167) > |3518|blockrequest| (-2) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568) > |3518|blockrequest| (-3) vcld, main (line: 448) > > 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|blockrequest.pm:process(167)|help > address: > 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|blockrequest.pm:process(172)|updated > process flag on blocktime_id= 4 > 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|blockrequest.pm:process(192)|processing > blocktime_id= 4 pass 1 > 2012-01-24 > 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|utils.pm:xmlrpc_call(9105)|argument_string= > XMLRPCprocessBlockTime 4 1 > 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|utils.pm:mail(1268)|SUCCESS -- > Sending mail To: 0, PROBLEM -- vcld:die_handler(636)|test > > |3518|blockrequest| ---- CRITICAL ---- > |3518|blockrequest| 2012-01-24 > 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|vcld:die_handler(636)|Can't > locate object method "type" via package "RPC::XML::Client::send_request: > HTTP server error: Protocol scheme 'https' is not supported > (LWP::Protocol::https not installed)" (perhaps you forgot to load > "RPC::XML::Client::send_request: HTTP server error: Protocol scheme 'https' > is not supported (LWP::Protocol::https not installed)"?) at > /usr/local/vcl/bin/../lib/VCL/utils.pm line 9121. > |3518|blockrequest| ( 0) vcld, die_handler (line: 636) > |3518|blockrequest| (-1) utils.pm, xmlrpc_call (line: 9121) > |3518|blockrequest| (-2) blockrequest.pm, process_block_time (line: 373) > |3518|blockrequest| (-3) blockrequest.pm, process (line: 193) > |3518|blockrequest| (-4) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568) > |3518|blockrequest| (-5) vcld, main (line: 448) > > 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|State.pm:DESTROY(829)|VCL::blockrequest > destructor called, address: 96b7c1c > 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|State.pm:DESTROY(848)|number of > database handles state process created: 1 > 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3459|vcld:REAPER(718)|VCL process exited for > reservation <unknown>, PID: 3518, signal: CHLD > > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:05, Mike Haudenschild <m...@longsight.com>wrote: > >> Hello, VCL dev -- >> >> I've seen three instances of "relaim" errors on my VCL instance today -- >> machines that vcld couldn't seem to reach, although they appeared running >> on the ESXi console. >> >> It started when I began creating block allocations (which did not appear >> to work). In both cases there seemed to be text in the log regarding >> incorrect SQL syntax. >> >> After the errors, the affected machines showed as "failed" in the VCL >> front end, but eventually reloaded and appear to be working fine. >> >> Regular, individual reservations appear to be working fine. I've >> attached both snippets of log and would appreciate any feedback. >> >> Many thanks, >> Mike >> > >
