________________________________
From: Aaron Coburn <acob...@amherst.edu>
To: vcl-dev@incubator.apache.org 
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: VCL block alloc, PERL module issue update

Oh. It looks like RPC-XML is not installed. 

You can verify that by using this command:

perl -MRPC::XML -e "print 'have a nice day'"

If you get errors, the module isn't installed. If the script seems friendly, 
then the module is installed.

If the module is not installed, download it from here: 
http://search.cpan.org/dist/RPC-XML/

unpack it and install it like so:

perl Makefile.PL
make && make test
sudo make install

Then try the command again that I listed above.



On Jan 31, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Mike Haudenschild wrote:

> Hi Aaron,
> 
> I get the following errors running install_perl_libs from trunk, on CentOS
> 5.7 fully updated:
> 
> *No package perl-CPAN available.*
> *WARNING: unexpected output returned while installing Linux package:
> 'perl-CPAN'*
> *this has happened since my first install, but doesn't seem to be a problem
> since cpan is already installed in CentOS base
> 
> *No package perl-RPC-XML available.*
> *WARNING: unexpected output returned while installing Linux package:
> 'perl-RPC-XML'*
> *this has also happened since my first install, but I've never been able to
> resolve this.  I thought perhaps the CPAN commands issued at the end of the
> install script installed RPC::XML from CPAN...?
> 
> All of the PERL module installs throw:
> *Unknown command 'notest'. Type ? for help.*
> 
> Two PERL modules fail to install:
> 
> *Attempting to install Perl module using CPAN: 'Object::InsideOut'*
> *Unknown command 'notest'. Type ? for help.*
> *checking if Object::InsideOut Perl module is installed...*
> *Perl module Object::InsideOut appears to be installed but the version
> could not be determined*
> *command: perl -e "eval \"use Object::InsideOut\"; print
> \$Object::InsideOut::VERSION" 2>&1*
> *output:*
> *ERROR: failed to install Perl module: 'Object::InsideOut'*
> 
> 
> *Attempting to install Perl module using CPAN: 'RPC::XML'*
> *Unknown command 'notest'. Type ? for help.*
> *checking if RPC::XML Perl module is installed...*
> *Perl module RPC::XML appears to be installed but the version could not be
> determined*
> *command: perl -e "eval \"use RPC::XML\"; print \$RPC::XML::VERSION" 2>&1*
> *output:*
> *ERROR: failed to install Perl module: 'RPC::XML'*
> 
> Thanks!!
> Mike
> 
> --
> *Mike Haudenschild*
> Education Systems Manager
> Longsight Group
> (740) 599-5005 x809
> m...@longsight.com
> www.longsight.com
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 14:43, Aaron Peeler <aaron_pee...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mike,
>> 
>> Apologies for not responding on this.
>> 
>> Are you still seeing this issue with your block allocations?
>> 
>> If so you could try to use the latest install_perl_libs.pl script
>> 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vcl/trunk/managementnode/bin/install_perl_libs.pl
>> 
>> Aaron
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Mike Haudenschild <m...@longsight.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Dev team,
>>> 
>>> I would very much appreciate guidance on whether I should try defining
>> (or
>>> bypassing) the SSL cert variables in the PERL scripts, or if I should/can
>>> downgrade the applicable PERL modules to older known-working versions to
>>> workaround this issue altogether.
>>> 
>>> The log was telling me that LWP::Protocol::https was required, and it's
>> not
>>> installed by the install_perl_libs script (because LWP::Protocol::https
>> was
>>> recently split out from libwww-perl?).  Once installed, however, I get
>>> static as shown in the logs below.
>>> 
>>> I'm dead in the water with block allocations.  Thanks very much for any
>>> help.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 21:00, Mike Haudenschild <m...@longsight.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Good evening,
>>>> 
>>>> I apologize for the numerous emails, but as I continue working through
>>>> this something new popped up:
>>>> 
>>>> I managed to get LWP::Protocol::https to install by first updating
>>>> Net::SSLLeay with CPAN.
>>>> 
>>>> However, when making a block allocation I now get this in the log:
>>>> 
>>>> |4978|blockrequest| ---- CRITICAL ----
>>>> |4978|blockrequest| 2012-01-24 20
>> :53:45|4978|blockrequest|vcld:die_handler(636)|Can't
>>>> locate object method "type" via package "RPC::XML::Client::send_request:
>>>> HTTP server error:* Can't connect to vclserver:443<
>> http://urichmond.longsight.com:443>(certificate verify failed)
>>>> *" (perhaps you forgot to load "RPC::XML::Client::send_request: HTTP
>>>> server error: Can't connect to server.domain.com:443 (certificate
>> verify
>>>> failed)"?) at /usr/local/vcl/bin/../lib/VCL/utils.pm line 9121.
>>>> |4978|blockrequest| ( 0) vcld, die_handler (line: 636)
>>>> |4978|blockrequest| (-1) utils.pm, xmlrpc_call (line: 9121)
>>>> |4978|blockrequest| (-2) blockrequest.pm, process_block_time (line:
>> 373)
>>>> |4978|blockrequest| (-3) blockrequest.pm, process (line: 193)
>>>> |4978|blockrequest| (-4) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568)
>>>> |4978|blockrequest| (-5) vcld, main (line: 448)
>>>> 
>>>> 2012-01-24 20
>> :53:45|4978|blockrequest|State.pm:DESTROY(829)|VCL::blockrequest
>>>> destructor called, address: f7be070
>>>> 2012-01-24 20:53:45|4978|blockrequest|State.pm:DESTROY(848)|number of
>>>> database handles state process created: 1
>>>> 2012-01-24 20:53:45|4138|vcld:REAPER(718)|VCL process exited for
>>>> reservation <unknown>, PID: 4978, signal: CHLD
>>>> 
>>>> My limited understanding of PERL is at play here, but from my research
>> it
>>>> seems that updated versions of LWP::UserAgent do strict SSL certificate
>>>> checking.  (We do have a CA-issued SSL cert installed for the VCL Web
>> front
>>>> end.)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/74358/how-can-i-get-lwp-to-validate-ssl-server-certificates
>>>> 
>>>> I'd very much appreciate any feedback from experts on the list.
>>>> 
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 20:12, Mike Haudenschild <m...@longsight.com
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I've been looking into this further, and I've found what appears to be
>> a
>>>>> missing PERL module (LWP::Protocol::https).  I attempted to install it
>>>>> manually with CPAN, but I get two test errors.  I've attached the CPAN
>>>>> error message immediately below, and the section of vcld.log from the
>>>>> moment I save the block allocation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks to all,
>>>>> Mike
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------
>>>>> 
>>>>> t/apache....# Failed test 1 in t/apache.t at line 12
>>>>> #  t/apache.t line 12 is: ok($res->is_success);
>>>>> # Failed test 2 in t/apache.t at line 13
>>>>> #  t/apache.t line 13 is: ok($res->content =~ /Apache Software
>>>>> Foundation/);
>>>>> t/apache....FAILED tests 1-2
>>>>>        Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay
>>>>> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> t/apache.t                2    2 100.00%  1-2
>>>>> Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 2/2 subtests failed, 0.00% okay.
>>>>> make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255
>>>>>  /usr/bin/make test -- NOT OK
>>>>> Running make install
>>>>>  make test had returned bad status, won't install without force
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|blockrequest.pm:
>> process(166)|owner
>>>>> email: root@localhost
>>>>> Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
>>>>>        /usr/local/vcl/bin/../lib/VCL/blockrequest.pm line 167 (#1)
>>>>>    (W uninitialized) An undefined value was used as if it were already
>>>>>    defined.  It was interpreted as a "" or a 0, but maybe it was a
>>>>> mistake.
>>>>>    To suppress this warning assign a defined value to your variables.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    To help you figure out what was undefined, perl tells you what
>>>>> operation
>>>>>    you used the undefined value in.  Note, however, that perl
>> optimizes
>>>>> your
>>>>>    program and the operation displayed in the warning may not
>> necessarily
>>>>>    appear literally in your program.  For example, "that $foo" is
>>>>>    usually optimized into "that " . $foo, and the warning will refer
>> to
>>>>>    the concatenation (.) operator, even though there is no . in your
>>>>>    program.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| ---- WARNING ----
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| 2012-01-24 19
>> :40:35|3518|blockrequest|vcld:warning_handler(610)|Use
>>>>> of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at
>>>>> /usr/local/vcl/bin/../lib/VCL/blockrequest.pm line 167.
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| ( 0) vcld, warning_handler (line: 610)
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| (-1) blockrequest.pm, process (line: 167)
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| (-2) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568)
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| (-3) vcld, main (line: 448)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|blockrequest.pm:
>> process(167)|help
>>>>> address:
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|blockrequest.pm:
>> process(172)|updated
>>>>> process flag on blocktime_id= 4
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|blockrequest.pm:
>> process(192)|processing
>>>>> blocktime_id= 4 pass 1
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|utils.pm:
>> xmlrpc_call(9105)|argument_string=
>>>>> XMLRPCprocessBlockTime 4 1
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|utils.pm:mail(1268)|SUCCESS --
>>>>> Sending mail To: 0, PROBLEM -- vcld:die_handler(636)|test
>>>>> 
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| ---- CRITICAL ----
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| 2012-01-24 19
>> :40:35|3518|blockrequest|vcld:die_handler(636)|Can't
>>>>> locate object method "type" via package
>> "RPC::XML::Client::send_request:
>>>>> HTTP server error: Protocol scheme 'https' is not supported
>>>>> (LWP::Protocol::https not installed)" (perhaps you forgot to load
>>>>> "RPC::XML::Client::send_request: HTTP server error: Protocol scheme
>> 'https'
>>>>> is not supported (LWP::Protocol::https not installed)"?) at
>>>>> /usr/local/vcl/bin/../lib/VCL/utils.pm line 9121.
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| ( 0) vcld, die_handler (line: 636)
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| (-1) utils.pm, xmlrpc_call (line: 9121)
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| (-2) blockrequest.pm, process_block_time (line:
>> 373)
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| (-3) blockrequest.pm, process (line: 193)
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| (-4) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568)
>>>>> |3518|blockrequest| (-5) vcld, main (line: 448)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19
>> :40:35|3518|blockrequest|State.pm:DESTROY(829)|VCL::blockrequest
>>>>> destructor called, address: 96b7c1c
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3518|blockrequest|State.pm:DESTROY(848)|number of
>>>>> database handles state process created: 1
>>>>> 2012-01-24 19:40:35|3459|vcld:REAPER(718)|VCL process exited for
>>>>> reservation <unknown>, PID: 3518, signal: CHLD
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:05, Mike Haudenschild <m...@longsight.com
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello, VCL dev --
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've seen three instances of "relaim" errors on my VCL instance today
>> --
>>>>>> machines that vcld couldn't seem to reach, although they appeared
>> running
>>>>>> on the ESXi console.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It started when I began creating block allocations (which did not
>> appear
>>>>>> to work).  In both cases there seemed to be text in the log regarding
>>>>>> incorrect SQL syntax.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> After the errors, the affected machines showed as "failed" in the VCL
>>>>>> front end, but eventually reloaded and appear to be working fine.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regular, individual reservations appear to be working fine.  I've
>>>>>> attached both snippets of log and would appreciate any feedback.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Many thanks,
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Aaron Peeler
>> Program Manager
>> Virtual Computing Lab
>> NC State University
>> 
>> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
>> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
>> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>> 

Reply via email to