ok. Then best bet is to update the computer records for the missing
mac addresses.

I typically use phpmyadmin or cmdline. I'm not sure what other tools
are available for editing mysql db's.

An issue with just deleting the computer record, is that there is also
a record in the resource table that is used to reference the
computer.id. This resource.id is used for computer groups and some
other things. If deleting only the computer record, then it would
cause other queries to fail.

Aaron

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Mike Haudenschild <m...@longsight.com> wrote:
> I've run into issues adding new machines that have MAC addresses matching
> "deleted" machines in 2.2.1.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Aaron Peeler <fapee...@ncsu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Aaron C. and Mike.
>>
>> Another method, you could mark them as deleted in the VCL web
>> interface and add new ones. To delete them you would need to remove
>> them from the virtual hosts and edit the hostname so you can reuse it.
>>
>> Aaron P.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Aaron Coburn <acob...@amherst.edu>
>> wrote:
>> > Michael,
>> >
>> > It isn't necessary to delete the rows from 'vcl.computer'. In order to
>> > edit
>> > the MAC addresses, you only need to update the 'eth0macaddress' and
>> > 'eth1macaddress' fields in the existing records.
>> >
>> > I wouldn't recommend it, but if you really need to delete the records
>> > from
>> > the computer table, there should be no issue as long as the
>> > vcl.reservation
>> > table is empty.
>> >
>> > Aaron
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Aaron Coburn
>> > Systems Administrator and Programmer
>> > Academic Technology Services, Amherst College
>> > acob...@amherst.edu
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Jun 20, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Michael Jinks wrote:
>> >
>> > Okay.
>> >
>> > If I go to SQL-land and delete the record for that host from the
>> > 'computers' table, will that be enough to remove it from the system or
>> > are
>> > there other areas of the DB I need to clean out as well?
>> >
>> > (Sorry if that's a dumb question, but I've found other areas where just
>> > removing a record doesn't remove all traces of the record, like the list
>> > of virtual machines assigned to a hypervisor, so I figured I should
>> > check before I start deleting things.)
>> >
>> > Thanks all.
>> >
>> > -m
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:16:04AM -0400, Josh Thompson wrote:
>> >
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> >
>> > Michael,
>> >
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, yes, in 2.2.1, you can only set MAC addresses via the add
>> >
>> > multiple computers page.  You'll need to set them in the database.  This
>> > is
>> >
>> > fixed in 2.3.
>> >
>> >
>> > Josh
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:12:52 AM Michael Jinks wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks Aaron.
>> >
>> >
>> > Ah, yes.  It didn't occur to me that we'd have to have MAC addresses
>> >
>> > defined for a machine we're capturing *from*.  I figured, well, it's
>> >
>> > running and has IP addresses...
>> >
>> >
>> > At any rate, I'm looking around the UI and I can't find any page that
>> >
>> > will let me enter a MAC address for an existing computer record.  Is
>> >
>> > this something I have to do by hand in the database?
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 08:46:40AM -0400, Aaron Peeler wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Michael,
>> >
>> >
>> > One thing that stands out in the log is that your MAC addresses are not
>> >
>> > defined. computer eth0 MAC address: <undefined>
>> >
>> > computer eth1 MAC address: <undefined>
>> >
>> >
>> > This will be needed to correctly create the vmx file and thus get an
>> >
>> > address from the private dhcp server that is should be running on your
>> >
>> > management node.
>> >
>> >
>> > Secondly also make sure you have the dhcp server setup on your
>> >
>> > management node for the private network.
>> >
>> >
>> > Aaron
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Michael Jinks <mji...@uchicago.edu>
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi, all.
>> >
>> >
>> > Trying to resurrect a thread I started on Friday, subject 'Image capture
>> >
>> > succeeds, then "fails"'. ?Mike Haudenschild helped me narrow down the
>> >
>> > problem but so far I haven't been able to find a cause or a fix.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm trying to capture my first Linux VM. ?Things go along okay through
>> >
>> > the capture stage, but (thanks Mike) we fail when VCL tries to reserve
>> >
>> > and deploy the new image.
>> >
>> >
>> > The critical message from the log appears to be:
>> >
>> >
>> > ?|17491|19:19|reload| ---- WARNING ----
>> >
>> > ?|17491|19:19|reload| 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > ?14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:load(395)|failed to prepare vmx
>> >
>> > file for vcl-linux-template-2-bak on VM host: vcl0001
>> >
>> > ?|17491|19:19|reload| ( 0) VMware.pm, load (line: 395)
>> >
>> > ?|17491|19:19|reload| (-1) new.pm, reload_image (line: 618)
>> >
>> > ?|17491|19:19|reload| (-2) new.pm, process (line: 248)
>> >
>> > ?|17491|19:19|reload| (-3) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568)
>> >
>> > ?|17491|19:19|reload| (-4) vcld, main (line: 346)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Further down, I'll paste in a complete copy of the log mail I got from
>> >
>> > this attempt.
>> >
>> >
>> > Our VM storage settings for this VM host are:
>> >
>> >
>> > ?Repository Path: ? ? ? /vmfs/volumes/nfs-vcl-templates
>> >
>> > ?Data Store Path: ? ? ? /vmfs/volumes/T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01
>> >
>> > ?VM Path: ? ? ? /vmfs/volumes/T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01
>> >
>> >
>> > (Note Data Store and VM are explicitly the same; we've also had VM Path
>> >
>> > set to "(empty)" with no apparent difference in behavior.)
>> >
>> >
>> > Both of those paths are writable on the hypervisor. ?During capture, a
>> >
>> > VM directory appears in both locations. ?In the directory under the
>> >
>> > Repository path, we have many vmdk files, sizes ranging from 842M to
>> >
>> > 1.5k, with names like:
>> >
>> >
>> > ?vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0-s001.vmdk
>> >
>> > ?vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0-s002.vmdk
>> >
>> > ?vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0-s003.vmdk
>> >
>> > ?[...]
>> >
>> > ?vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0-s016.vmdk
>> >
>> > ?vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0.vmdk
>> >
>> >
>> > My first guess is that we have one vmdk file for each attempted capture,
>> >
>> > and this is a series of xdiffs on the original?
>> >
>> >
>> > In the Data Store/VM directory, we have:
>> >
>> >
>> > ?# pwd
>> >
>> > ?/vmfs/volumes/T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01/vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0
>> >
>> > ?# ls -lh
>> >
>> > ?-rw------- ? ?1 root ?root ? 30.0G Jun 19 20:12
>> >
>> > vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0-flat.vmdk ?-rw------- ? ?1 root
>> >
>> > ?root ? ? 527 Jun 19 20:12 vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0.vmdk
>> >
>> >
>> > So, it seems that those locations are accessible and writable, and being
>> >
>> > written. ?What else might cause the vmx file prep to fail? ?I went to
>> >
>> > VMware.pm line 395, but that's a call to a subroutine, prepare_vmx(),
>> >
>> > which is a fairly lengthy chunk of code and doesn't appear to be
>> >
>> > dropping any breadcrumbs as it runs, only the failure message when it
>> >
>> > exits. ?So stepping through that without guidance is going to be a
>> >
>> > challenge.
>> >
>> >
>> > Meanwhile we've also started trying to capture a Windows image. ?That's
>> >
>> > dying too, but with a different set of error messages. ?I'll post that
>> >
>> > under separate cover.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for any insight. ?Complete log message follows.
>> >
>> > -m
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > reservation failed on vcl-linux-template-2-bak: process failed after
>> >
>> > trying to load or make available
>> >
>> > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > - time: 2012-06-19 14:10:22
>> >
>> > caller: State.pm:reservation_failed(213)
>> >
>> > ( 0) State.pm, reservation_failed (line: 213)
>> >
>> > (-1) new.pm, process (line: 298)
>> >
>> > (-2) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568)
>> >
>> > (-3) vcld, main (line: 346)
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > management node: pilot-lab.uchicago.edu
>> >
>> > reservation PID: 17491
>> >
>> > parent vcld PID: 2491
>> >
>> >
>> > request ID: 19
>> >
>> > reservation ID: 19
>> >
>> > request state/laststate: reload/image
>> >
>> > request start time: 2012-06-19 14:10:12
>> >
>> > request end time: 2012-06-19 14:40:12
>> >
>> > for imaging: no
>> >
>> > log ID: none
>> >
>> >
>> > computer: vcl-linux-template-2-bak
>> >
>> > computer id: 7
>> >
>> > computer type: virtualmachine
>> >
>> > computer eth0 MAC address: <undefined>
>> >
>> > computer eth1 MAC address: <undefined>
>> >
>> > computer private IP address: 10.50.84.15
>> >
>> > computer public IP address: 10.50.84.15
>> >
>> > computer in block allocation: no
>> >
>> > provisioning module: VCL::Module::Provisioning::VMware::VMware
>> >
>> >
>> > vm host: vcl0001
>> >
>> > vm host ID: 1
>> >
>> > vm host computer ID: 1
>> >
>> > vm profile: VMware ESXi - IT Services
>> >
>> > vm profile VM path: /vmfs/volumes/T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01
>> >
>> > vm profile repository path: /vmfs/volumes/nfs-vcl-templates
>> >
>> > vm profile datastore path: /vmfs/volumes/T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01
>> >
>> > vm profile disk type: localdisk
>> >
>> >
>> > image: vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0
>> >
>> > image display name: linux-template-2v12
>> >
>> > image ID: 26
>> >
>> > image revision ID: 22
>> >
>> > image size: 30720 MB
>> >
>> > use Sysprep: yes
>> >
>> > root access: yes
>> >
>> > image owner ID: 1
>> >
>> > image owner affiliation: Local
>> >
>> > image revision date created: 2012-06-19 14:08:20
>> >
>> > image revision production: yes
>> >
>> > OS module: VCL::Module::OS::Linux
>> >
>> >
>> > user: vclreload
>> >
>> > user name: vcl reload
>> >
>> > user ID: 2
>> >
>> > user affiliation: Local
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > RECENT LOG ENTRIES FOR THIS PROCESS:
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:20|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_image_size_bytes(3841)|retrie
>> >
>> > ved the size of the image from the datastore on the VM host:
>> >
>> > 32,212,255,247> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19 14:10:20|17491|19:19|reload|
>> >
>> > VMware.pm:get_image_size_bytes(3851)|image size retrieved from both the
>> > image
>> >
>> > repository and VM host datastore:
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| image repository: 2,398,356,996
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| VM host datastore: 32,212,255,247
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19 14:10:20|17491|19:19|reload|
>> >
>> > VMware.pm:get_image_size_bytes(3871)|size of
>> > vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-
>> >
>> > v0 image:
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 32,212,255,247 bytes
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 30,720 MB
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 30.00 GB
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:20|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_vm_additional_vmx_bytes_requi
>> >
>> > red(4713)|8053063811 additional bytes required for REDO files because VM
>> >
>> > disk mode is NOT persistent> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19 14:10:20|17491|19:19|reload|
>> >
>> > VMware.pm:get_vm_additional_vmx_bytes_required(4716)|estimate of
>> > additional
>> >
>> > space required for the vmx directory:
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| vmem/vswp file: 536,870,912 bytes, 512.0 MB, 0.50
>> >
>> > |GB
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| redo files: 8,053,063,811 bytes, 7,680.0 MB, 7.50
>> >
>> > |GB
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| total: 8,589,934,723 bytes, 8,192.0 MB, 8.00 GB
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:20|17491|19:19|reload|Linux.pm:file_exists(1404)|'/vmfs/volumes/T
>> >
>> > 2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01/vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0/vmwarelinux-linux
>> >
>> > template2v1226-v0.vmdk' exists on vcl0001, files: 1, directories: 0,
>> >
>> > links: 0 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:20|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_image_size_bytes(3819)|VM
>> >
>> > profile vmdisk is set to 'localdisk', attempting to retrieve image size
>> >
>> > from image repository 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Linux.pm:file_exists(1404)|'/vmfs/volumes/n
>> >
>> > fs-vcl-templates' exists on vcl0001, files: 0, directories: 0, links: 1
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:is_repository_mounted_on_vmhost(5
>> >
>> > 485)|image repository is mounted on VM host vcl0001:
>> >
>> > /vmfs/volumes/nfs-vcl-templates 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_image_size_bytes(3821)|checki
>> >
>> > ng size of image in image repository mounted on VM host:
>> >
>> > vcl0001:/vmfs/volumes/nfs-vcl-templates> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Linux.pm:get_file_size(2022)|size
>> >
>> > of '/vmfs/volumes/nfs-vcl-templates/vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-
>> >
>> > v0/vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0*.vmdk' on vcl0001:
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| used: 2,398,356,996 bytes, 2,287.3 MB, 2.23 GB
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| allocated: 3,605,390,848 bytes, 3,438.4 MB, 3.36 GB
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Linux.pm:get_file_size(2022)|size
>> >
>> > of '/vmfs/volumes/T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01/vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-
>> >
>> > v0/vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0*.vmdk' on vcl0001:
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| used: 32,212,255,247 bytes, 30,720.0 MB, 30.00 GB
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| allocated: 32,212,320,256 bytes, 30,720.1 MB, 30.00
>> >
>> > |GB
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_image_size_bytes(3841)|retrie
>> >
>> > ved the size of the image from the datastore on the VM host:
>> >
>> > 32,212,255,247> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|
>> >
>> > VMware.pm:get_image_size_bytes(3851)|image size retrieved from both the
>> > image
>> >
>> > repository and VM host datastore:
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| image repository: 2,398,356,996
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| VM host datastore: 32,212,255,247
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|
>> >
>> > VMware.pm:get_image_size_bytes(3871)|size of
>> > vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-
>> >
>> > v0 image:
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 32,212,255,247 bytes
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 30,720 MB
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 30.00 GB
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_vm_additional_vmdk_bytes_requ
>> >
>> > ired(4657)|no additional space required for vmdk files because they
>> >
>> > already exist on VM host 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_vm_additional_vmdk_bytes_requ
>> >
>> > ired(4662)|VM requires appoximately 0 additional bytes (0 MB, 0 GB) of
>> >
>> > disk space on the VM host for the vmdk directory 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:check_vmhost_disk_space(2070)|eno
>> >
>> > ugh space is available on shared vmx/vmdk volume on VM host vcl0001:
>> >
>> > '/vmfs/volumes/T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01'> >
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| vmx additional space required: ? ? ? ?
>> >
>> > |?8,589,934,723 bytes, 8,192.0 MB, 8.00 GB 17491|19:19|reload| vmdk
>> >
>> > |additional space required: ? ? ? ? 0 bytes, 0.0 MB, 0.00 GB
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| total additional space required: ? ? ?
>> >
>> > |?8,589,934,723 bytes, 8,192.0 MB, 8.00 GB 17491|19:19|reload| shared
>> >
>> > |vmx/vmdk volume available space: 1,042,905,300,992 bytes, 994,592.0
>> >
>> > |MB, 971.28 GB> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Module.pm:create_mn_os_object(335)|manageme
>> >
>> > nt node OS object has already been created, address: 3997f10, returning
>> >
>> > 1 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Module.pm:new(203)|VCL::Module::Semaphore
>> >
>> > object created, address: 3cd4360 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Module.pm:code_loop_timeout(742)|attempting
>> >
>> > to open lockfile, maximum of 1200 seconds 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Module.pm:code_loop_timeout(759)|attempt 1:
>> >
>> > attempting to open lockfile 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Semaphore.pm:open_lockfile(146)|opened and
>> >
>> > obtained an exclusive lock on file:
>> >
>> > /tmp/vcl0001-vmfs-volumes-T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01-vmwarelinux-linuxtemplat
>> >
>> > e2v1226-v0.lock 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Module.pm:code_loop_timeout(762)|attempting
>> >
>> > to open lockfile, code returned true 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:21|17491|19:19|reload|Module.pm:get_semaphore(844)|created
>> >
>> > Semaphore object, memory address: 3cd4360 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|Linux.pm:file_exists(1404)|'/vmfs/volumes/T
>> >
>> > 2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01/vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0/vmwarelinux-linux
>> >
>> > template2v1226-v0.vmdk' exists on vcl0001, files: 1, directories: 0,
>> >
>> > links: 0 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:prepare_vmdk(1785)|VM is not
>> >
>> > persistent and nonpersistent vmdk file already exists on VM host
>> >
>> > vcl0001:
>> >
>> > /vmfs/volumes/T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01/vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0/v
>> >
>> > mwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0.vmdk 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|Semaphore.pm:release_lockfile(248)|deleted
>> >
>> > file:
>> >
>> > /tmp/vcl0001-vmfs-volumes-T2_6045_dev_VCL_ds01-vmwarelinux-linuxtemplat
>> >
>> > e2v1226-v0.lock 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|Semaphore.pm:DESTROY(281)|destroyed
>> >
>> > Semaphore object, memory address: 3cd4360 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|utils.pm:insertloadlog(3875)|inserted
>> >
>> > computer=7, transfervm, copied vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0 to
>> >
>> > vcl-linux-template-2-bak 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_vm_ram(4306)|image ram
>> >
>> > setting is too low: 0 MB, 512 MB will be used 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:get_vm_os_configuration(4210)|ret
>> >
>> > rieved default VM configuration for OS: linux-x86_64> >
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| : {
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| : ? "ethernet-virtualDev" => "e1000",
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| : ? "guestOS" => "otherlinux-64",
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| : ? "scsi-virtualDev" => "lsiLogic"
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| : }
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| ---- WARNING ----
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > |14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:_automethod(812)|correspo
>> >
>> > |nding data has not been initialized for get_computer_eth0_mac_address:
>> >
>> > |$self->request_data->{reservation}{19}{computer}{eth0macaddress}
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| ( 0) DataStructure.pm, _automethod (line: 812)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-1) Autoload.pm, __ANON__ (line: 80)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-2) VMware.pm, prepare_vmx (line: 1457)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-3) VMware.pm, load (line: 394)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-4) new.pm, reload_image (line: 618)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-5) new.pm, process (line: 248)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| ---- WARNING ----
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > |14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|VMware.pm:load(395)|failed to prepare vmx
>> >
>> > |file for vcl-linux-template-2-bak on VM host: vcl0001
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| ( 0) VMware.pm, load (line: 395)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-1) new.pm, reload_image (line: 618)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-2) new.pm, process (line: 248)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-3) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-4) vcld, main (line: 346)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| ---- WARNING ----
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > |14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|new.pm:reload_image(623)|vmwarelinux-linux
>> >
>> > |template2v1226-v0 failed to load on vcl-linux-template-2-bak, returning
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| ( 0) new.pm, reload_image (line: 623)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-1) new.pm, process (line: 248)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-2) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-3) vcld, main (line: 346)
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|utils.pm:insertloadlog(3875)|inserted
>> >
>> > computer=7, loadimagefailed, vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0 failed
>> >
>> > to load on vcl-linux-template-2-bak> >
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| ---- WARNING ----
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > |14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|new.pm:process(295)|failed to load
>> >
>> > |vcl-linux-template-2-bak with vmwarelinux-linuxtemplate2v1226-v0
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| ( 0) new.pm, process (line: 295)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-1) vcld, make_new_child (line: 568)
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| (-2) vcld, main (line: 346)
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:get_computer_state_name(23
>> >
>> > 05)|attempting to retrieve current state of computer
>> >
>> > vcl-linux-template-2-bak from the database 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:get_computer_state_name(23
>> >
>> > 36)|retrieved current state of computer vcl-linux-template-2-bak from
>> >
>> > the database: reloading 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:_automethod(834)|data
>> >
>> > structure updated:
>> >
>> > $self->request_data->{reservation}{19}{computer}{state}{name}> >
>> >
>> > |17491|19:19|reload| computer_state_name = reloading
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:get_computer_private_ip_ad
>> >
>> > dress(1581)|attempting to retrieve private IP address for computer:
>> >
>> > vcl-linux-template-2-bak 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:get_computer_private_ip_ad
>> >
>> > dress(1585)|retrieved contents of /etc/hosts on this management node,
>> >
>> > contains 18 lines 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:get_computer_private_ip_ad
>> >
>> > dress(1645)|returning IP address from /etc/hosts file: 10.50.84.15
>> >
>> > 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|utils.pm:is_inblockrequest(6163)|zero rows
>> >
>> > were returned from database select 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:get_image_affiliation_name
>> >
>> > (2035)|image owner id: 1 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|utils.pm:getnewdbh(2709)|database requested
>> >
>> > (information_schema) does not match handle stored in $ENV{dbh}
>> >
>> > (vcl:128.135.107.122) 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|utils.pm:getnewdbh(2760)|database handle
>> >
>> > stored in $ENV{dbh} 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:retrieve_user_data(1352)|a
>> >
>> > ttempting to retrieve and store data for user: user.id = '1' 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|utils.pm:getnewdbh(2709)|database requested
>> >
>> > (vcl) does not match handle stored in $ENV{dbh}
>> >
>> > (information_schema:128.135.107.122) 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|utils.pm:getnewdbh(2760)|database handle
>> >
>> > stored in $ENV{dbh} 2012-06-19
>> >
>> > 14:10:22|17491|19:19|reload|DataStructure.pm:retrieve_user_data(1415)|d
>> >
>> > ata has been retrieved for user: admin (id: 1)
>> >
>> > - --
>> >
>> > - -------------------------------
>> >
>> > Josh Thompson
>> >
>> > VCL Developer
>> >
>> > North Carolina State University
>> >
>> >
>> > my GPG/PGP key can be found at pgp.mit.edu
>> >
>> >
>> > All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
>> >
>> > are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
>> >
>> > Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>> >
>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> > Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
>> >
>> >
>> > iEYEARECAAYFAk/h2yoACgkQV/LQcNdtPQNYCwCfcWNdBbopf+RZXv8XaW7vbSVM
>> >
>> > DukAn2Jf9bCwqoObueZtHRDydTevhMX1
>> >
>> > =ucyU
>> >
>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Michael Jinks :: mji...@uchicago.edu :: 773-469-9688
>> > University of Chicago IT Services
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Aaron Peeler
>> Program Manager
>> Virtual Computing Lab
>> NC State University
>>
>> All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
>> are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
>> Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
>
>



-- 
Aaron Peeler
Program Manager
Virtual Computing Lab
NC State University

All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which
are sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public
Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Reply via email to