On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:01, Dieter Plaetinck <die...@plaetinck.be> wrote:
> i would rather rename a file to <name>.disabled.sh or something, instead of
> setting executable flags
> on files which are not supposed to be executed.
That does not scale across several checkouts (neither does +x, for
that matter) without dirty hacks. You may need/want to have a hook in
one place, but not in another.
You _do_ plan to version control and distribute the hooks, don't you?
vcs-home mailing list