On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:01, Dieter Plaetinck <[email protected]> wrote:
> i would rather rename a file to <name>.disabled.sh or something, instead of > setting executable flags > on files which are not supposed to be executed. That does not scale across several checkouts (neither does +x, for that matter) without dirty hacks. You may need/want to have a hook in one place, but not in another. You _do_ plan to version control and distribute the hooks, don't you? Richard _______________________________________________ vcs-home mailing list [email protected] http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-home
