On 02/03/08 12:27, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>> On 02/03/08 11:43, Rolf Ahrenberg wrote:
>>> No. The current features in 1.5.14 are still missing some essential key
>>> features that should be included in the next stable version: DVB
>>> subtitling (still missing component type support for the hard of
>>> hearing), EBU subtitling, native channels.conf support for pseudo DVB
>>> devices (pvrinput, iptv, analogtv), and multiple channel lists.
>> I am not going to deal with these things before DVB-S2/H.264, anyway.
> I've been using VDR for about a year and a half now and it's great. But with
> all due respect, I think you're doing this the wrong way around. At least
> here in Finland, decent DVB subtitles support is pretty much the only thing
> VDR needs to be usable out-of-the-box with the free channels we have.
> In my opinion DVB-S2/H.264 are "nice to have" extra features, but working DVB
> subtitling support is a "must have" feature for PVR software like VDR,
> because almost everyone needs DVB subtitles around here, but not that many
> watch HDTV channels yet.
Which version of VDR are you using?
The current developer version does have DVB subtitling support.
vdr mailing list