Dieter Hametner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > I couldn't run properly vdr 171 + s2api + extension patch + s2api patch +
>> > h.264patch that's why I keep vdr 170 + s2api patch + h.264patch
>> There's a git repository for vdr at http://git.gekrumbel.de/?p=vdr.git
>> Wouldn't it be appropriate to use it to maintain a working
>> vdr+s2+h264 source tree ?
> I'm maintaining that aforementioned git repository. I didn't want to host
> different versions of VDR in this git repository (except the 'original
> sources' git).
Ok, sorry I should have asked you first.
BTW is it used by a lot of people ?
> This repository is intended to be used as a source for cloning own git
> repositories and pulling upcoming development changes provided by Klaus
> Schmidinger. If you clone it to a public git hoster (or publish it on some
> own server) and add the various patches (s2api, h.264 etc.), it will be easy
> for others to retrieve already patched versions of VDR to their local
> If I get informed of such a repository I will be happy to add a link on my
> git hosting site, to inform others about the patched VDR git existence.
> Look at git homepage http://git.or.cz/ for a list of public git hosting
I'm not a h264 or s2api user yet, it would be very nice if some people
could maintain such a repository.
It's seem messy to get these patches working and questions about them
are very recurrent.
vdr mailing list