On 27.12.2010 14:10, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
> 
>> On 19.12.2010 02:46, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
>>>  I have created a channel.conf from dvbscan and used the built update
>>> function from VDR.
>>>
>>> All channels seem to be added/modified properly, but the FTA channels
>>> are different. Instead of modifying my current entry, it created new ones.
>>>
>>> Nederland 
>>> 1;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:0000:0000:0000:0:1101:8720:2214:0
>>> Nederland 
>>> 1;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7011:7012:7013:0:1101:8720:2211:0
>>> Nederland 
>>> 2;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:0000:0000:0000:0:1102:8720:2214:0
>>> Nederland 
>>> 2;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7021:7022:7023:0:1102:8720:2211:0
>>> Nederland 
>>> 3;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:0000:0000:0000:0:1103:8720:2214:0
>>> Nederland 
>>> 3;Digitenne:546000000:C12D12M64B8T8G4Y0:T:27500:7031:7032:7033:0:1103:8720:2211:0
>>>
>>> I took the liberty of expanding the VID, AID and TID from 0 to 0000 so
>>> they'd align better in this e-mail only.
>>>
>>> All entries work however! Which baffles me. How can something without
>>> vid/aid work at all? Also, it seems that the 'proper' entry doesn't
>>> display EPG data at all. Ironically, the scrambled channels all seem to
>>> work just fine. Any clues on this?
>> The channels with zero PIDs have a TID (Transport stream ID) of 2214, ehile
>> those with actual PIDs have 2211. Only one of these can be right, I guess.
> 
> Yip, I changed the TID to 2214 to get both epg info and not have VDR
> re-add it over and over again. Question remains, why does dvbscan and
> vdr-backgroundscanner find different TID's :S

That's a good question - let me know if you have the answer ;-)

Klaus

_______________________________________________
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Reply via email to