Dan & Federico,
This is really a good news~ Our VDSM-REST test uses simple unittest as
you expected, I'll get my hands on adjusting my code to the stub you pushed.
Thank you!
2012/2/28 Federico Simoncelli <fsimo...@redhat.com>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>
> > To: "Royce Lv" <lvroyce0...@gmail.com>, "Federico Simoncelli" <
> fsimo...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> > Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 4:37:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: [vdsm] vdsm test release plan
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:05:50PM +0800, Royce Lv wrote:
> > > Guys,
> > > ***** We have unittest cases for VDSM REST API at hand and
> > > expect to merge
> > > them with* VDSM test harness. So would someone provide a
> > > schedule of VDSM
> > > test release plan? Will it be released with VDSM or in another
> > > repository?We'd like to work with it as soon as possible.
> > > **** Thanks a lot!
> >
> >
> > How about not waiting for this any longer?
> >
> > I suggest that we use simple unittest. If you push test modules as
> > the
> > following, I'm sure we can integrate it with any harness we come up
> > with in the
> > future. Just throw your modules under /test!
> >
> > (Correct me, Federico, if you had something else in mind)
>
> You're correct Dan. I just pushed a stub that I prepared some time ago:
>
> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/2356
>
> > import unittest as ut
> >
> > class MyTest(ut.TestCase):
> > def testThis(self):
> > pass
> > def testThat(self):
> > pass
> >
> > def suite():
> > tests = {MyTest: ["testThis", "testThat"]}
> > resSuite = ut.TestSuite()
> > for testcase, methods in tests.iteritems():
> > resSuite.addTests(map(testcase, methods))
> >
> > return resSuite
>
> --
> Federico
>
_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
