On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:00:31AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Sean Legassick wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:20:11AM +0000, Sean Legassick wrote:
> > > Actually the patch below is only a little bit of what I want :-)
> >
> > Actually it was a tiny if not non-existent bit of what I want :-)
> >
> > The log only says 'InvocationTargetException' which isn't much help -
> > the patches below fix that and dig out the wrapped exception. I added a
> > patch for PropertyExecutor because this is just as relevant there.
> >
> > BTW as regards adding proper exception propogation I'm willing to code
> > up some patches myself if the principle and the type of exception to
> > throw is agreed...
> >
>
> Just to summarize so it's clear - you are not looking for invocation
> exceptions to be thrown (because those are a natural part of the
> introspection flail-o-matic in some places, but any exceptions *your*
> methods throw to propogate, right?
Yep, absolutely (although given enough prodding of an invocation
exception one can get at the heart of the problem anyway, but it
probably makes sense to strip that layer away - like you say its just
part of the introspection mechanism gubbins)...
--
Sean Legassick
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Czlowiekiem jestem i nic co ludzkie nie jest mi obce
