"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sean Legassick wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 08:00:31AM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > Just to summarize so it's clear - you are not looking for invocation
> > > exceptions to be thrown (because those are a natural part of the
> > > introspection flail-o-matic in some places, but any exceptions *your*
> > > methods throw to propogate, right?
> >
> > Yep, absolutely (although given enough prodding of an invocation
> > exception one can get at the heart of the problem anyway, but it
> > probably makes sense to strip that layer away - like you say its just
> > part of the introspection mechanism gubbins)...
>
> I was thinking about this and looking through the code.
>
> I think its a good idea to propagate exceptions from method invocations
> out through Template.merge().
I agree, +1.
--
Daniel Rall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
