Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >
> > I don't know why my statments are interpreted to be 'pushing back'
> > or something...
>
> I didn't read it that way. In fact, I'm thrilled that *BOTH* the log4j and
> velocity teams were quite willing to make changes and reacted so quickly.
>
> However, I still believe that it is important for released versions of
> velocity to work with released versions of log4j. So my preference when it
> is possible is for an orderly deprecation.
+1
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
