Sending again : apologies if you see this twice.
From: Paulo Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Then "ReferenceInsertionEventHandler.referenceInsert()" keeps
> its name?
>
>
> I am making this remark because I suggested renaming it to:
> "ReferenceRenderEventHandler.referenceRender()"
>
> and you answer was
> > That's good too - I think that the 'Insert' came from the notion of
> > 'inserting' into the output stream.
>
>
> Of course that I prefer the name I suggested (I think it is less
> ambiguous), but I can take a conscious "no" too. I just want to make
> sure that you didn't just forget it. (Your well fundamented NO's are
> usually quite ok with me.)
>
I guess I kinda threw up my hands and said 'Feh!', or something like that.
I figured that the NullSetEventHandler method was downright confusing, as
you pointed out, so that warranted a change.
As to the other, since referenceInsert() was suggested by Leon, the first
person to implement and test, and it does make some kind of semantic sense -
called when a reference value is about to be inserted into the output
stream - and no one but us seems to care, I left it.
If we get other howls of protest, then I think we still can change it before
v1.1 goes 'gold'...
geir
